Modern Day Leonardo

Kinetic sculptor Theo Jansen's animaris percipiere made of PVC piping. One of his Strandbeests. It moves like an animal with nothing more than wind locomotion.
If you've been wondering where all the modern day Leonardo da Vinci's are, well, here's one. His name is Theo Jansen, a kinetic sculptor that lives in Holland. He calls his "animals" Strandbeests. Check out this video from the BBC's Wallace and Gromit's World of Invention, Episode 1 Preview:
http://www.wimp.com/kineticsculpture/
If that link doesn't work, here's the YouTube version:
And here's Theo's own website, Strandbeest:
The Dumbing Down of America
Or, Whatever Happened to Hayley Mills?
People assume that Americans today are more sophisticated and less gullible because we have become a more visually-oriented society. But in the process of becoming more visual, we have become less literate and less literary, less educated and less informed, less conversational and less relational, less "thinking" (both logically and in regards to "horse sense"); we have a shorter attention span and are more inclined to addiction, violence, etc. What that means is that our society is more vulnerable to sensationalism by the media, manupulation by advertisers, gullibility of a new sort, emotionalism, repeating the mistakes of the past, following after the latest "star" (whether rock, movie or sports), etc. More than ever, we are a society of sheep going astray and less a nation of individual thinkers and doers as our forefathers were.
I don't know of any advantage of becoming a more visually-oriented society and I know of hundreds of disadvantages. The Egyptians were a visually-oriented society. What that produced, ultimately, was a weak society of god-rulers (stars) and slaves (fans).
Thinking and communication have always been based on words, not images. The Egyptians may have been great artists, engineers and builders, but they were by no means great thinkers. The Greeks and Romans were far more literary, and were therefore far greater thinkers. The British were probably the most literary of all societies and they have produced the greatest thinkers of all time, including our founding fathers.
Communism in Hollywood
As a "Whore of Babylon," Hollywood has sold its soul to the god of money, and is a tarnished lady; but is she unredeemable?
Vision Forum, the Christian homeschooling and family resource ministry, offers a CD by filmmaker Geoff Botkin called "Hollywood's Most Despised Villain." When I listened to it, I was not convinced that Hollywood had ever been the target of Communist strategists, as Mr. Botkin proports. I had been studying Hollywood for over thirty years, and knew of very few American films, besides Warren Beatty's Reds and maybe The Way We Were, that I would say were sympathetic to Communism. I felt Mr. Bodkin was preaching from fanaticism due to his own conversion from Communism, rather than from facts - much as my dad used to preach relentlessly against the evils of smoking after he had given up cigarettes. People who have been converted from something tend to be the biggest opponents to it, even to the point of fanaticism. So, I was skeptical.
When you read about McCarthyism and the hearings conducted by the House Committee on Un-American Activities back in the 1950s, the evidence is pretty unclear. Neither side seems particularly convincing. The best testimony that I know of that there was subversive Communist activity in Hollywood in the 1950s is from our film-actor-turned-president, Ronald Reagan: he said there were a lot of Communists in his profession. I believe Ronald Reagan.
But I came across another piece of evidence that helps support Mr. Bodkin's claim.









